SQreen about NS: “People at every BSB take their buddies, and then sit there whining that someone there has understated PTS”

Dota 2 analyst Khaled sQreen El-Habbash continued the conflict with Yaroslav NS Kuznetsov. In his personal Telegram channel, he stated that he does not agree with the accusations against the player rating system at BETBOOM Streamers Battle 14 and believes that the main reason for the failures of the NS team was the captain’s decisions in the draft.

According to sQreen, Kuznetsov regularly recruits his friends, who, according to the analyst, are already inferior to other participants both in terms of level of play and media coverage.

Published preserving the spelling and punctuation of the source

By the way, I’ll tell you in more detail the situation with the ns: For each battle, a person takes his buddies, who in terms of Dota, and media, are no longer fresh, on this BSB he has a recrent (20 pts) and a sunlight IN THE ROLE OF COWs) + the ns and fng themselves in the role of subs, i.e. a priori it’s impossible to come up with a composition of loose ones, because they take 20 pts in the middle player + sunlight who never played well on the core, i.e. CHEL picked 3 subs in the team + put in the middle to eat 20pts man and 1 poor guy otaker on carry (alternatives for which by pts were also better), and then he sits whining that someone there has underestimated pts)) If we take a closer look: sunlight's starting ratings 76, I gave him a rate of 66, in total with my rating he still has 73, why didn’t my underrate help you, my friend? Fng I also gave a rating lower than it was, i.e. 71, with his starting 76, in total he also has 73. This is despite the fact that for their points (73) + 6 points in reserve, they have a bunch of smart cows: shachlo (67), elmo (69), 9pasha (69), blindzone (74), undershock (75), afterlife (76), dkfogas(77), dizzying(77), xanni(78), krylat(78), hina(78), mariachi(79), cooman(79) ITD Instead of otaker, there is Shigetsu(90) or smiley knight(89), where the difference is essentially a couple of pts, but they play better. That is, you have 146 + 6 pts on fng and sunlight, in total 152, for which you can easily take a conditional pasha + undershock, which will pay for its 144 pts many times over and put recrent (or any other low pts media) on sapa, but in the end you decide to take your sidekick sapa and give him a core role, and also put 20pts recrent in the middle, and then the screen is to blame)) despite the fact that I still rated your buddies lower than they were initially. The situation is clearly reminiscent of when a person walks and [hits] himself on a rake, although there is a normal road nearby, but he is purposefully a masochist and wants to [hit himself], and then hang shit on the fan in the media field, it’s funny and that’s all.

In conclusion, sQreen stated that the organizers of BETBOOM Streamers Battle have significantly improved the balance system compared to previous seasons.

To sum it up: the orgs are great, they really started to seriously balance the system and players after a bunch of seasons, but while they have caps like NS playing, who put a spoke in their own wheels and instead of the proposed good players with whom they can win, they take drunken friends - it’s clearly not worth counting on anything other than last places. The main problem of streamer battles is not the balance, but the same “media” captains who want to play only with their buddies, against other captains who play to win and take better players, and then the first ones wonder how it happened, why they lost, there is clearly some kind of imbalance in the system

Previously, NS criticized the BetBoom Streamers Battle 14 player rating system. In his opinion, the final ratings were “ruined” due to too much weight of expert opinion, as well as sQreen’s work as one of the two rating compilers at the tournament.